{"id":23940,"date":"2020-03-30T14:41:51","date_gmt":"2020-03-30T14:41:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.skydivemag.com\/new\/?p=23940"},"modified":"2024-04-18T10:03:59","modified_gmt":"2024-04-18T10:03:59","slug":"finding-your-perfect-canopy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.skydivemag.com\/new\/finding-your-perfect-canopy\/","title":{"rendered":"Finding your perfect canopy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
Photo by Willy Boeykens<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pete Allum discusses factors to consider to find your ideal canopy. He gives examples from his own canopy progression, and some other skydivers’ current choices, with their reasons…<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Surfboard Progression<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Allow me to explain something that happened within surf culture in the 1990s: All through the \u201860s, \u201870s and \u201880s board design had been going through rapid and radical change, then in the \u201890s top competitive surfers started riding the thinnest and lightest possible boards. This was sublime if you were surfing good waves and had the requisite ability, but for most of us, these boards made it very hard to even catch a wave. Riding them felt magical for brief moments but they were generally wasted on me and I just ended up swallowing more seawater than was good for me.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

I won this canopy, a Pintail 144 at the ’91 South African accuracy nationals. I loved it! Such a change in direction to many of the other canopies that were out at the time but like the Excalibur it suffered from not having the right material ready for it. I lost this canopy after taking it ground launching one too many times, it\u2019s still in a 70\u2019 pine tree somewhere near Gap if anyone would like it.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Canopy Progression<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

OK, now I\u2019m heading back to our sport\u2026
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the \u201870s when I started jumping, the general progression through canopies was whatever you could get your hands on, this was either a piece of garbage round canopy or something that was over 200 square feet. Then through the \u201880s and \u201890s we were slowly drip fed ever progressive wings, which never dropped below 100 square feet. At the end of the \u201890s the skydiving world was treated to the wings that heralded the start of the current trend and led us on to the VK, Leia, Petra, Peregrine etc. These canopies have been designed to deliver peak performance to well qualified pilots. 
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ideal pilot for a state-of-the-art performance wing is someone who has spent time under the larger and more docile versions and expresses a desire to push the envelope with their flying. These pilots are geeks who will happily discuss, planforms, relative air density, Fly-sight data, glide ratios and recovery arcs all night long in the thirst to improve their knowledge and performance. These skydivers will seek out coaches, attend training camps and along the way make many thousands of jumps in the pursuit of increased performance. When you look at an Instagram post from one of these pilots, you see mind-blowing images but have little idea of the work and time that has gone into getting to that level. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So, how do we decide what wing is good for us?
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

you see mind-blowing images but have little idea of the work and time that has gone into getting to that level”
<\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

I have over 10,000 jumps on a Velocity [84 pictured, from 2000ish] and I have to say they were unmatched for soooo long! To this day I get my CP students to master the Velo before they even think about a Schumann wing platform, there is so much to learn from this amazing wing. I recently put my Comp Velo \u201979 in my Mutant, it was a joy to fly and re-acquaint myself with.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

What is your frame of reference?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

How you are as a person, your character and personality? This may seem rather an esoteric question in the search for the ideal parachute but have a think about how you like to drive a car; do you drive a performance sports car to its limits or do you like to cruise comfortably along, or maybe you enjoy both? Do you see yourself as agile, or clumsy, are you an older skydiver, have you had an injury or have you recently gained or lost a lot of weight?
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now to your skydiving history, how many jumps do you have and over what period of time, on what canopies, how was your progression up to this point, have you had canopy coaching?
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are you 65 kilos or are you 125 kilos? If you are light, you may have been forced to fly wings that are too small, too soon, in the mistaken understanding that canopies scale down evenly, in fact a smaller canopy, even at the same wing loading is going to be more sensitive to many inputs.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The way that a wing works is based completely on physics and aerodynamics but we perceive its performance from behind the veil of our frame of reference, our pre-conceptions and our level of ability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n


<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Peregrine 64, my choice for XRW or swoop competitions \u2013 <\/em>Pete<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

What are you looking for in a canopy?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

If you want to specialize in a particular discipline and you already have some experience then these choices may be a little easier. Most good canopy manufacturers offer wings for each speciality and you can look towards the leaders in your discipline to understand what the ultimate wing may be for you.  In the mean-time there are intermediate wings and wing loadings that can offer an introduction to the way a particular wing performs; a reputable coach\/mentor can guide you through the maze.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Opening<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

When looking at different wings, many of us assume that they are all going to open smoothly and on heading, however the performance of a canopy can also have a knock-on affect with regards to its behaviour on opening. For example, a canopy that tends to roll easily will be more sensitive to an uneven body position on opening, as would a more heavily loaded smaller wing. This is the reason why the more sensible wing-suiters prefer canopies that lack the high-end performance that swoopers crave and instead opt for lighter wing loads and smaller pack volumes so that they can jump the biggest wing possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In any case, make sure that you pay full attention on deployment and give the wing the best platform possible. And check out this article<\/a>.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

VK 75, this is my everyday canopy, from big ways to flocking, to training, I have the most jumps under this canopy and feel really at home, my wing loading is 2.3 \u2013 Pete<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n


<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Performance<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

You may be at the stage of your progression when you need to build good habits as your awareness steadily increases and you try not to be a danger to others (a lifetime’s work!).
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Your descent rate or wing loading should be manageable for you to plan your approach and landing, giving you sufficient time on each leg to notice what is happening, relative to your target, plus you also need time to react to other traffic. 
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jumping a smaller wing is only going to exacerbate the problem giving you less time under canopy\u201d <\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

One concern for newer skydivers that are jumping a wing at 1.0 or lighter, is that they may not be able to jump in certain wind conditions. If you are uncomfortable jumping under a lighter wing load as the wind increases then you should probably be on the ground. Jumping a smaller wing is only going to exacerbate the problem giving you less time under canopy and just wait until you get that thing going downwind! There is nothing to say that you cannot jump a lightly loaded wing in high winds, you just need to understand how and where to fly the canopy. As your experience increases on these canopies you will learn how to fly in varying conditions. 
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This is Allegra, who jumps into remote, small landing areas all over the world. She chose the Sabre 2 -150 based on conversations with canopy coaches, for its all-round performance and excellent flare.. I was also jumping a Sabre 150. I often jump Sabre2s \u2013 135, 150, 170 & 190 depending upon what my air to air student is jumping.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pitch, roll and yaw<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pitch, roll and yaw\u2026 Your wing loading and the type of canopy that you fly will give you very different performance in all of these axes.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Pitch<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Pitch,<\/strong> is the change of angle in a straight line, e.g. flaring for landing or using the front risers to dive. This is a symmetrical input. Some canopies have a steeper angle and maintain a dive for longer, some recover more quickly. 
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Roll<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Roll,<\/strong> is the change of bank angle e.g. a toggle turn. Some canopies roll easier than others and feel easier to steer with the harness.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Yaw<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Yaw,<\/strong> is the change of heading e.g. a flat turn. Some canopies are easy enough to make flat turns with, some are more challenging to keep them from rolling.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Remember with any change in the roll and yaw axis you also get a change in pitch.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although we all start steering the canopy with the toggles, you very quickly learn to use other inputs e.g. body and risers. If you can learn this control on a more lightly loaded wing you are forced to fully explore the correct techniques in order to make the canopy fly efficiently. If you downsize too quickly, the canopy can run away from you and you can easily find yourself close to the ground or in traffic with more speed and descent rate than you are able to handle.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you are looking to increase or change the performance of your wing, you should try the other type of wing at the same or a lighter wing loading, the basic rule is to never downsize and change the type of wing in one step. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

never downsize and change the type of wing in one step
<\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Here is a photo of Navdeep and I, both on Sabre 2 120s. He chose this because he really wants to learn to become a competition canopy pilot in the future, the Sabre 2 with its flight characteristics is a good step in the learning process before getting onto something like a Katana.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Landing<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Yes, some canopies are easier to land than others, however with correct technique you can make all of them work (nowadays anyway – this was not always the case). We are not born with this ability, it is a skill and some folk just learn quicker than others. Do not let people tell you that you lack the ability to land a canopy correctly, sometimes you just lack the training and experience.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rig sizes<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Many people tell me that the reason they are looking to downsize is that they want to jump a smaller or lighter rig. Do not make this the deciding factor, for example if you wanted to go scuba diving you probably wouldn\u2019t take less air because it was a little less cumbersome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also, the difference in weight between a 190 square foot rig and a 150 square foot rig is only 1.2kilos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are some excellent canopies on the market that have smaller pack volumes if you are looking for a slightly smaller container, without the need to downsize.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Daniel chooses the Horizon 7-cell as it’s designed to open smoothly in a wingsuit burble, fun to fly and a small pack volume. Photo by Raymond Adams<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

In conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

If you are unable to comfortably fly and land the canopy that you are currently flying and are thinking of downsizing: Think again! First of all, ask a recognised canopy coach if it is the correct type of wing for you and then figure out if you are flying and landing it with the correct technique.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Please do not make the journey all about downsizing. Figure out, with some expert help, what kind of wing you should be jumping, then the correct wing loading for your frame of reference and your ability. 
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When we learn how to drive, most of us don\u2019t immediately try to get into the fastest thing on the road. Unless we are planning to race, we tend to drive very similar vehicles to what we learned on. Imagine an uncontrolled highway with no lanes, traffic lights, roundabouts and few rules, full of new drivers in Ferraris\u2026 Seems like a sky full of people with less than 1000 jumps on Valkyries and Leias!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This is Lesley, she loves big-way and chooses the Stiletto 120, for its on-heading openings and easy landings even downwind. It’s not ground-hungry so suits her flying style, with plenty of time to check out the canopy traffic. Photo by Andy Vernum<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Article originally published on <\/em><\/strong>Augusto Bartelle’s blog<\/em><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\n

Addendum by author Pete Allum,  16 April 2024<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Pete Allum<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

I wrote this article in 2020 and still feel pretty strongly about the information that I shared, which is odd, as quite often I re-read articles and find the advice to be out of date with what I am currently thinking (I try to change my mind about things on a regular basis).<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

From 2019 I started to paraglide again and am constantly searching for more information from within that sport, here is a paragraph quoted from an article by Jack Peake in issue 248 of \u201cCross Country\u201d :<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI believe thinking of wings hierarchically is otherwise a misnomer. As Ed Ewing, editor of the magazine, puts it, \u201cIf you think of available gliders as a selection of tools rather than a hierarchy or pyramid, then it all becomes more sensible. It relieves the pressures of progression and becomes about choosing the right equipment for your ability, currency, and situation.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>

\u00a0“The idea of \u2018progression\u2019 can lead pilots to believe there is a ladder to climb in the sport with respect to gear. There need not be one. With respect to skill, certainly there are practical limitations, but ultimately, I agree with Ed. The primary question should revolve around what the pilot wants to do, assuming they are able.<\/em><\/span><\/p>

“Put another way, as children, we didn\u2019t look at the colour spectrum as a progression of \u201cimproving\u201d wavelengths from red to violet when colouring; the colours merely differ. We just looked at our crayons and chose the colour that suited the picture. As Jocky puts it, \u201cEvery case is individual, and you can\u2019t deny what you\u2019re feeling.\u201d<\/em><\/span><\/p>Jack Peake<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Author Pete Allum landing his Valkyrie 71
Photo by Javier ‘Buzz’ Ortiz<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Wings that I am currently using, in 2024 <\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n